Filed under: Searching
IPNews Flash:This free service allows you to search for patent families complete with their legal status based on INPADOC data provided by the European Patent Office.
Filed under: Patent terminology
The terms filing date and priority date are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same. The filing date is the date when a patent application is first filed at a patent office. The priority date, sometimes called the “effective filing date”, is the date used to establish the novelty and/or obviousness of a particular invention relative to other art.
The priority date may be earlier than the actual filing date of an application. If an application claims priority to an earlier parent application, then its priority date may be the same as the parent.
There are a number of situations where a patent application may claim priority to an earlier application. These include:
* Continuation applications (including continuations, divisionals, and CIPs). A patent application may claim priority to an earlier filed parent application. When this occurs, the priority date of the new application is usually the same as the priority date of the parent application.
* Domestic applications based on foreign or international filings. If a patent application is first filed in a foreign country, or as an international (PCT) application, and then filed domestically (usually within a year the foreign or international filing), then the application that is filed domestically may claim the filing date of the application in the foreign country as its priority date.
* Patent filings based on US provisional patent applications. In the US, an applicant may file a provisional patent application, and then file a full-length application within one year. In this case, the priority date for the full-length application is the date of the provisional application filing.
In many cases, a patent application claims priority to a series of applications. For example, a continuation application may claim priority to a parent utility application, which claims priority to a US provisional application. The new application may then claim priority to the first filed application in the series, which in this case, is the provisional application.
If a patent application is an original, non-provisional patent application, not a continuation application, and not previously filed in another country, its filing date is usually the same as its priority date.
Different sections on Patent Searching..Click here
1. Introduction
2. General U.S. Patent Information
3. Why Conduct a US Patent Search?
4. Patent Search Databases
5. Patent Search Procedure
7. Learning From the Patents Found
8. Examine Products
9. Search the Marketplace
10. Search Inventions and Patents for Sale
11. Search Emerging Technologies
12. Miscellaneous Patent Search Links
Filed under: Searching
- Determine if a particular invention is unique
- Identify potential features for new product
- Identify other possible uses for a new product
- Determine independent inventors or companies currently or historically obtaining patents in a particular area
- Find the patent(s) for a particular invention
- Determine the state of the art in a particular area
- Identify patents in a specific field for generating citation maps (a tool in determining the relative importance/value of a specific invention
- Study the rate of innovation in a particular area
- Determine the patent portfolio of a specific company
- Determine if an invention infringes upon the intellectual property rights of others
- Learn about an industry or a specific company
- Search for potential solutions to design or safety problems
- Identify potential licensees
- To identify additional reference materials (journal articles, books, product literature) of use to those working in this area. Patents often list printed reference materials.
- Identify inventors working in a certain field.
Filed under: Searching
Google Patent Search searches the USPTO database and can search full text of the older patents (that cannot be done from the USPTO site)
Filed under: Interesting
500 million internet users in Asia Pacific….
Yet 82.5% of the world’s population is not online…………….
Filed under: Interesting
Comparison between the USPTO search and the Google search of the number of documents that show up for each year in a ten year period for the use of the word “Internet”:1995
USPTO – 84 patents
Google – 124 patents
1996
USPTO – 217 patents
Google – 246 patents
1997
USPTO – 419 patents
Google – 460 patents
1998
USPTO – 1,740 patents
Google – 467 patents
1999
USPTO – 3,389 patents
Google – 416 patents
2000
USPTO – 5,055 patents
Google – 537 patents
2001
USPTO – 6,905 patents
Google – 614 patents
2002
USPTO – 8,810 patents
Google – 651 patents
2003
USPTO – 11,031 patents
Google – 667 patents
2004
USPTO – 13,800 patents
Google – 732 patents
2005
USPTO – 14,368 patents
Google – 740 patents
Filed under: Searching
Legal resources and tools for surviving the patenting frenzy of the Internet, bioinformatics, and electronic commerce. The site gives the information about why, how many “not valid patents” are issued and their details- Bustpatents.com
Filed under: Patent news
Nokia facing massive $17.7 billion law suit
-More Information
Filed under: Patent news
Indian LPOs could generate $20 billion in the next decade-More Information